Phineas Fahrquar:

So, the IPCC probably knew about this research, but chose to ignore it because it didn’t fit the preferred alarmist narrative. The dishonesty of the global-warming crowd is astonishing.

Originally posted on Watts Up With That?:

IPCC TAR WG1 (2001) summary, “Figure 5: Millennial Northern Hemisphere (NH) temperature reconstruction (blue – tree rings, corals, ice cores, and historical records) and instrumental data (red) from AD 1000 to 1999. Smoother version of NH series (black), and two standard error limits (gray shaded) are shown. [Based on Figure 2.20]”. Adapted from the MBH99 graph which Jerry Mahlman nicknamed the “hockey stick”. Image: Wikipedia

Pierre Gosselin at NoTricksZone reports:

Geologist Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt found a Japanese tree-ring temperature reconstruction from 1995, one that should have been heeded by the IPCC and Michael Mann before they took the world on a 10-year joyride in the stolen car of “climate science”.

Here’s the Google translation of their article, with some fixes of my own to help it along written in [brackets]. I don’t vouch for total accuracy in the translation, but it is the best I can…

View original 875 more words

About these ads

Comments are closed.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,935 other followers

%d bloggers like this: