An Inconvenient Truth: new glaciers forming in Scotland

August 25, 2014
Ben Nevis south face

Ben Nevis: winter is coming?

Once again the Earth defies the Received Truth of the Cult of Global Warming. Among the signs and portents of coming DOOM!! is supposed to be the disappearance of glaciers, indicating that the Earth is warming dangerously.

Well, apparently no one sent Ben Nevis, Scotland’s highest mountain, the memo, because researchers there have found evidence of new glaciers being born:

Hazards common in arctic and alpine areas but described as “extremely unusual” in the UK during the summer have been found on Ben Nevis.

A team of climbers and scientists investigating the mountain’s North Face said snowfields remained in many gullies and upper scree slopes.

On these fields, they have come across compacted, dense, ice hard snow call neve.

Neve is the first stage in the formation of glaciers, the team said.

The team has also encountered sheets of snow weighing hundreds of tonnes and tunnels and fissures known as bergschrunds.

The large, deep cracks in the ice are found at the top of glaciers.

Glaciers retreat and advance all the time, as evidenced by the uncovering of ancient forests and archaeological discoveries coming from times when Man was not pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, something Warmists would rather you not think about.

And yet now, in this period of supposed catastrophic Man-caused climate change, when life on Earth hangs by a thread unless we do something now to stop a warming that hasn’t taken place for over 17 years, it seems new glaciers are forming and growing. As Anthony Watts writes at WUWT:

This is how ice ages start – a buildup of snow which does not melt in the Summer, which leads to a positive feedback loop, as the growing ice sheet reflects more and more sunlight back into space.

Now, I’m not predicting a new Ice Age or “global cooling,” nor is Anthony. But as I think Earth’s warming and cooling are better explained by natural cycles rather than human intervention, and since we already have historical experience of the Little Ice Age that seemed to mirror a decline in sunspot activity, a decline that again may be happening, I think an extended period of cooling is more likely than catastrophic warming.

These newborn glaciers could be another sign of that.


UK Government Study: Greens use more electricity than skeptics

July 15, 2014

Phineas Fahrquar:

Oh, taste the sweet, sweet irony.

Originally posted on Watts Up With That?:

Story submitted by Eric Worrall

A UK government study has concluded that people concerned about global warming, on average, use more electricity than climate skeptics.

Some highlights from the study follow.

On the “benefits” of switching off appliances;

View original 227 more words


Coldest Antarctic June Ever Recorded

July 12, 2014

Phineas Fahrquar:

Looks like the Antarctic didn’t get the memo from Al Gore, Phil Jones, and Michael Mann.

Originally posted on Watts Up With That?:

Story submitted by Eric Worrall

Antarctica continues to defy the global warming script, with a report from Meteo France, that June this year was the coldest Antarctic June ever recorded, at the French Antarctic Dumont d’Urville Station.

View original 135 more words


1971 – World’s Top Climate Scientists Said Fossil Fuels Would Cause An Ice Age By 2020

June 9, 2014

Phineas Fahrquar:

Amusing. In 1971, “top climate scientists” were screaming about a coming ice age and that CO2 was nothing to worry about, then, suddenly they were all about the warming. And the name James Hanson appears in both camps… What a coincidence.

Originally posted on Real Science:

In 1971, the world’s top climate scientists Schneider, Hansen and Rasool predicted that burning fossil fuels would trigger an ice age. They also determined that CO2 was nothing to worry about.

ScreenHunter_380 Jun. 08 22.26ScreenHunter_388 Jun. 08 22.30

ScreenHunter_389 Jun. 08 22.31U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

A few years later they realized that there was much more research money available for global warming, so they changed their scientific judgment to say the exact opposite of what they said in 1971.

View original


Bookshelf update: The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism

May 25, 2014

Renaissance scholar astrologer

I’ve updated the “What I’m reading” widget to the right to reflect the latest item on the Public Secrets lectern, Steve Goreham’s The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism.”

book cover goreham mad climatism

I’m only a few chapters into it, so far, but it seems to be a good discussion for the layman of the “science” of global warming and its politics, and the flaws, errors, and problems in both. It’s available in both Kindle (1) and paperback formats.

PS: Why, yes. This is a shameless bit of shilling on my part. I like getting the occasional gift certificate that comes from people buying stuff via my link. But I still think it’s a good book.

Footnote:
(1) I’m happy to say I’ve found no typos or formatting errors, so far. These are all too common in Kindle e-books.


Governor ‘Moonbeam’ beclowns himself over sea level rise at LAX airport

May 13, 2014

Phineas Fahrquar:

Sigh. And yet he’s sure to win reelection. I weep.

Originally posted on Watts Up With That?:

Proof positive politicians can’t do simple math.

From the LA Times today:Brown_LAX_SLR

Brown’s remarks came a day after the release of two studies finding that a slow-motion and irreversible collapse of a massive cluster of glaciers in Antarctica has begun and could cause sea levels to rise worldwide by four feet within 200 years.

“If that happens, the Los Angeles airport’s going to be underwater,” Brown told reporters at a presentation of his revised state budget proposal in Los Angeles. “So is the San Francisco airport.”

Source: http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-brown-sea-level-airports-20140513-story.html

Ok let’s do the math, first a look at the sea level rate from the Los Angeles tide gauge operated by NOAA:

View original 424 more words


Subaqueous volcanism: ocean vents and faulty climate models

May 4, 2014

Phineas Fahrquar:

Interesting post on why climate modelers tend to ignore underwater volcanism: it doesn’t fit with their nice, neat, predictable equations. Yet how useful then are their climate models?

Originally posted on Watts Up With That?:

WUWT reader Pethefin writes:

Finally someone addresses the really big elephant in the room: the ocean vents and their role in climate modelling:

I covered this possibility in a previous post:  Do underwater volcanoes have an effect on ENSO? and I have updated that post with this animation showing a heat plume disconnected from the ENSO pattern and Google Earth graphic showing possible subaqueous volcanism sources (you may have to click the top graphic to get it to animate).

ENSO_volcanic_heat_plume_Animationpossible_ocean_heat_plume_sounce

This excerpt from an essay published on Quadrant Online by John Reid also explores the question.

It hardly needs to be said that climate modelling is a far-from-settled science, despite what its practitioners would have us believe. Just how flawed becomes even more apparent when you consider that massive heat sources on the ocean floor have been entirely omitted from the warmists’ calculations

THE TOTAL power expended in volcanic heating of the…

View original 435 more words


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,172 other followers