But don’t you dare call it a “biased media.”

International Liberty

I agree that Obama inherited a crappy economy, and I think it is silly to assert that he bears any responsibility for the severity of the 2007-2009 recession.

But it is very fair to hold him responsible for what’s happened since the recession ended. I’ve cited data from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve on both employment and gross domestic product to show that Obama has presided over the weakest recovery in the post-World War II period.

And I think it is fair to blame Obama for the economy’s anemic performance during that time, largely because his agenda of faux stimulus and Obamacare exacerbated the statist policies of Bush. In other words, he promised “hope” and “change,” but delivered more of the same.

Well, now that the election is over, even the Washington Post is willing to admit that Obama’s economic performance is dismal. Here’s a remarkable chart showing that…

View original post 218 more words

One Response to

  1. Tregonsee says:

    Remember the Bush 41, economy, “the worst in 50 years?” The Washington Post ran a great artilce debunking that. When: the day after the 1992 election. Same old, same old.

%d bloggers like this: