I think we can call this a “non-starter” of an idea


“Wait. She’s serious?”

Let pedophiles adopt? Sure, and let’s give junkies keys to the pharmacy, while we’re at it:

Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.

In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

Well, if it’s only a few, why should we be concerned about putting child-molesters into direct, daily, and intimate contact with the objects of their perverse obsession? What could go wrong?

This is one those milestones on the road to the collapse of civilization, isn’t it?


via Jonah Goldberg:

3 Responses to I think we can call this a “non-starter” of an idea

  1. Thinking this woman needs to be put away to where she can’t do any harm. She is a menace just thinking of harmful stuff like let pedophiles adopt.

  2. […] I think we can call this a “non-starter” of an idea […]

  3. thatmrgguy says:

    Me thinks there’s a bit of self interest in this woman’s idea.

%d bloggers like this: