January 26, 2015
Last week, Iranian-backed “Fiver” Shia rebels captured Yemen’s capital and forced the president to resign. Given that the former government had (mostly) cooperated with our counter-terrorism efforts and given also that the Houthi rebels were supported by our enemy, Iran, one might expect them to be hostile to us.
The New York Times, however, is here to tell us we’re wrong. The good news? They’re really moderates!
But for all their harsh sloganeering, the Houthis may be a lot more moderate than [their motto] suggests, according to many diplomats and analysts who have followed them closely. They say it would be premature to dismiss them as Yemen’s Hezbollah, despite their alliance with Iran.
Of course, we all remember those “moderate Islamists” in Syria we were so happy to work with and train, right? That’s sure worked out well.
Anyway, back to Yemen. Let me ask — does this look at all “moderate” to you?
Yep. The very soul of moderation. Why, I bet they belong to their local Kiwanis Club, too.
It’s said the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. The coffee table version of that is obviously illustrated with pictures of The Times and its “experts.”
via Patrick Poole, who has much more
June 29, 2010
Good thing Obama is cutting funding for missile defense; otherwise he might be forced to face the fact that it works:
The test involved the intercept of a short-range unitary target in the endoatmosphere (inside the earth’s atmosphere). The target, representing a short-range ballistic missile threat, was launched from an at-sea mobile launch platform located in the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii. Upon acquiring and tracking the target, the THAAD system developed a fire control solution and launched an interceptor missile, which acquired and successfully intercepted the target missile. The intercept occurred at the lowest altitude to date for the THAAD interceptor missile, which has the capability to engage targets both inside and outside the earth’s atmosphere.
Here’s video of the test in action:
McKittrick at Closing Velocity provides some more fun facts for skeptics. Here are a couple:
- It was a nighttime intercept, which has been touted by skeptics to be some sort of impossible challenge.
- The target SCUD was launched from the decommissioned USS Tripoli, mimicking the oft-referenced scenario of a sneaky, rust-bucket freighter lurking off the coast of a major city.
Click through to read the rest.
Now, you’d think that with potential ballistic missile threats from Iran and North Korea, any American president would want to put in place systems to shoot down single missiles or small-scale attacks. You would be wrong. Let me remind you of then-Senator Obama’s promise, which seems to be one of the few he plans to keep:
I’m certain missile defense has plenty of technical challenges remaining to be dealt with, and no one believes it’s close to being a shield for North America in case of a massive attack, but it strikes me as more than a bit irresponsible for the administration not to pursue this for defense against smaller attacks when the technology seems so promising.
UPDATE: Hot Air relates the disturbing news that the Obama administration may be open to killing missile defense via a treaty.
November 18, 2009
Charles Krauthammer on why trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian Federal court in New York City is a bad idea: