Greenpeace: We Spit on Your Sacred Spaces

December 14, 2014

The clueless narcissism of the self-proclaimed “activist” is at once both infuriating and amazing.

Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

Desecrating cultural and religious monuments is normal Greenpeace behaviour.

Nasca_lines_greenpeace screengrab from the BBC website (click)

Activism is about persuasion. It’s about using moral arguments to change people’s minds which, in turn, changes the world.

For moral arguments to be successful, we need to already inhabit the same approximate moral universe. Some things are sacred. The ends don’t justify the means. This isn’t rocket science, but apparently it’s news to Greenpeace.

In Peru, where a UN climate summit is currently taking place, the Ministry of Culture says Greenpeace activists have desecrated an important cultural monument.

The NazcaLines are a collection of approximately 300 figures etched into the Peruvian desert more than 1,500 years ago. In the words of vice-minister Luis Jaime Castillo, an archeologist by training, the figures

are absolutely fragile. They are black rocks on a white background. You walk there and the footprint is going to…

View original post 244 more words


Chronicles of the new barbarians — #OccupySanDiego

November 8, 2011

They just want to spread the wealth around.

My blog-buddy Sister Toldjah has a post up about the appalling behavior of those who claim to represent “the little guy” in San Diego: two small businesses (micro, really) made the mistake of trying to be nice and started giving free food and drink to the “Occupiers,” then learned that the “requests” were really endless demands and that they would be bankrupted if this kept up. So the vendors, “little guys” like the rest of us, did the logical thing: they cut the “Occupiers” moochers off. What did the valiant warriors for the 99% do in return?

They trashed the two businesses, including hitting them with blood and urine. The owners may well be forced out of business because of this.

And, like Oakland’s Mayor Quan, San Diego’s mayor is a spineless appeaser.

Occupy really are the new Vandals, and violence is their core.

PS:
Do visit ST’s post. She’s posted information about how we can help the vendors recover their businesses.

PPS:
Remember, Democrats: your party supports these thugs.


The heart of the #Occupy movement is violence

November 3, 2011

The original Occupy movement

What was I saying about the “new Vandals?”

Conn Carroll of The Washington Examiner today presents video of Occupy Oakland “staff” trying to stop others from trashing a local Whole Foods store. But, as Carroll points out, the presence of Occupy Oakland “officials” tells us they had some idea trouble would break out, yet went ahead with the march, anyway, thus making them responsible.

Why? Because the central idea of Occupy is the seizure of control of another’s property. His final paragraph lays bare the violent logic at the core of the movement:

…When you assert control over something that someone else owns (Brookfield Properties, the taxpayers, etc), there is eventually going to be a physical confrontation when that owner tries to reassert control. That is what we are seeing in police/occupier clashes across the country.

And this is what President Obama, the Chairwoman of the Democratic Party, and sundry others, have aligned themselves with.

Again, this is no longer an issue of freedom of speech; no one is advocating that free political speech be repressed — as long as the rights of others are respected. But these people have crossed a line by trampling on the property rights of others (1) and threatening their livelihoods and even their safety. It is time for city mayors to do the jobs for which they are being paid and order the mobs to disperse — and to send in the police to enforce the order, if need be.

Footnote:
(1) And I don’t just mean who physically owns the ground; companies of all sizes have shareholders, and those shareholders, whether individual investors or big investment houses (who in turn serve individual investors) have a property interest in their shares in those businesses and in their future profits. Same with sole owners of small businesses, whether it’s a hot dog cart on a corner near Zuccotti Park or a crafts store in Oakland. When Occupy “does its thing,” it harms the very people it claims to be fighting for. What about their rights?

(Crossposted at Sister Toldjah)